So, I just watched this film. I had every intention of pointing out everything I felt was wrong with it, until I saw the closing credits and I realised that it was a true story. However, I will still point out flaws as perceived by me.
The first thing that struck me was Russell Crowe’s quite obvious overacting. All the facial movements, his speech, everything was just a little overdone and nothing felt natural. His accent also annoyed me immensely. I am aware that the film must be somewhat accurate and that the accent was perhaps necessary, but have you ever heard an American trying to pull off an Irish or English accent? An Australian trying an American accent is equally as painful.
Before I continue, I should point out that the basic plot of the film was good, and I am very interested in biographical films. However, I felt that they embellished it a little too much, and I didn’t find it realistic at all.
I think I should also point out that I am by no means a film buff or anything remotely close to it, this is my own opinion, and if you feel it is wrong, well all I can say is tough.
Anyway, back to the film. Even with all those bad points, it is not an awful film. As I mentioned before, the basic plot is good and if you are willing to overlook obvious flaws, it could be considered a not-too-bad way of passing 2 hours (yes, it is also very long and drawn out).
I think overall score on this one: 6/10
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment